Annie J. Cosgrave

Annie J. Cosgrave

Annie J. Cosgrave
Badge #6700, White Female
Police Officer at 112th Precinct since October 2021
Service started April 2021, made $80,300 last year, Tax #971384
annie.cosgrave@nypd.org

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Question
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital

Complaints

5 Complaints
13 Allegations
6 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Complainant Unavailable
2 SRAD Closure
1 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202508058, August 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202501145, January 2025
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202411582, November 2024
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant:
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant:
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202411576, August 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202303981, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Asian Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Complainant: Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Age)
Complainant: Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202508058, August 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Female, 35-39 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202501145, January 2025
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202411582, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Gender Complainant Unavailable
Discourtesy: Action Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202411576, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 55-59 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202303981, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Asian Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Stop Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Question Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Age) Female, 70-74 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Singh, Jaspreet, et al. vs City of New Yor, et al.
Case # 26CV00342, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 10, 2026

Perry, Sonia vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV02914, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 30, 2025