Andrew J. Tofalli

Andrew J. Tofalli

Andrew J. Tofalli
Badge #1312, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Vice Enforcement Squad Zone 2 since December 2024
Also served at Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Public Safety Teams, 77th Precinct, Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Community Response Team
Service started July 2013, made $153,000 last year, Tax #955584

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28775
Closed: 10/4/2023
Case: 2022-25969
Closed: 6/28/2023
Case: 2022-27142
Closed: 12/22/2022

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
7 Allegations
4 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202311837, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202310075, October 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202103678, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202100558, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201700929, January 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 67
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202311837, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202310075, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Puerto Rican Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details
Complaint #202103678, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202100558, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201700929, January 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 67 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28775
Closed: 10/4/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs (activity log).
  2. Failed to make required entries in Department logs (sign out of command log)
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, instructions
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25969
Closed: 6/28/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-27142
Closed: 12/22/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits.

Burgess, Laquasia, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 512920/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, May 9, 2023
Complaint
Description: On or about February 19, 2022, when plaintiffs were siding inside their family’s car police officers pulled into the parking lot within a few minutes of the plaintiffs’ arrival and immediately approached the plaintiffs asking for identification. When plaintiffs asked for the reason why officers were asking for identification, police officers proceeded to forcibly remove the plaintiffs from the vehicle. The officers tightly handcuffed the plaintiffs and searched the car. Nothing illegal as found. The officers found an unopened Bombay Gin in the backseat that belongs to a backseat seated member. Nonetheless, the officers transported the plaintiffs to the precinct and seized the vehicle. Police accused the plainti...

Taylor, Dennis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 523050/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, January 9, 2020
Complaint
Description: On July 24, 2018, the plaintiff drove from New Jersey to Brooklyn, New York, to visit his mother. After parking his vehicle a block away, he stopped briefly to greet two brothers he knew at 1735 Sterling Place. While the plaintiff was speaking with the brothers, 15-20 individuals with motorcycles, whom the plaintiff did not know, were also present. At approximately 6:50 p.m., police officers, including Sergeant Gabriel Cuevas, arrived at the scene and ordered everyone to disperse. The plaintiff was about to enter the brothers’ property to avoid being subjected to the officers' orders, but Sergeant Cuevas screamed at him to leave. When the plaintiff attempted to explain his connection to the residents, Sergeant...

Sagy, Igal vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV01975, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 13, 2018, ended October 11, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff sustained injuries from being tasered and beat by Defendant Officers before being arrested, was not given proper medical attention. Plaintiff had seven different charges filed against him, all of which were dismissed.

Stewart, Fitzpatrick vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 522306/2017, Supreme Court - Kings, November 24, 2017
Complaint
Description: On January 27, 2017, Plaintiff was lawfully and properly present on the premises when Defendant Tofalli and other NYPD defendants assaulted and battered the Plaintiff without probable or just case, grounds, or provocation. Plaintiff suffered injury and damage both mentally and physically, severe nervous shock, and emotional distress and illness. Defendants wrongfully and unlawfully arrested, detained, and imprisoned Plaintiff despite knowing Plaintiff was innocent of the criminal charges then and there filed against him. Plaintiff was compelled to appear before a judge to be arraigned, where the charges were dismissed, discharged, and disposed.

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #201909824