Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2011-5642
Opened: 8/31/2011
Closed: 2/18/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
On multiple occasions, assisted and/or requested the assistance of other members of the service to prevent the processing and adjudication of numerous summonses issued to various individuals
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1)year. Forfeiture of twenty-five (25) vacation days, five (5) day suspension without pay.
Urena, Naisha an Infant By Mng Ovalles-Diaz, Celeste A. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 160092/2013,
Supreme Court - New York, November 12, 2013, ended November 7, 2014
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 13, 2013, the infant Plaintiff was lawfully inside their home when they were assaulted and battered by several NYPD defendants, including but not limited to POs Cook, Walsh, Giancarlos-Alia, and several other unknown NYPD officers. The assault and battery on the Plaintiff were without probable cause and was not the result of an appropriate arrest. The Defendants then arrested and confined the infant Plaintiff without any legal grounds, justification, or warrant. As a result of the actions of the Defendants, the infant Plaintiff became sick, sore, lame, and disabled and received serious and severe injuries. The Defendants then submitted an erroneous police report to cover up their actions and initiate...