Jarrett D. Dill

Badge #17550, Black Male, 43
Police Officer at 42nd Precinct since December 2018, active
Service started January 2006, made $139,000 last year, Tax #940094

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) (2)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Discourtesy: Other
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Other

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25589
Closed: 10/18/2023
Case: 2022-25590
Closed: 5/3/2023
Case: 2016-16226
Closed: 8/9/2016
Case: 2012-8756
Closed: 5/22/2013

View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
18 Allegations
8 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202207257, October 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202107143, November 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202004551, June 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, March 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #201510925, December 2015
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201104536, April 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201009365, July 2010
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Black Female, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200913776, July 2009
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #202207257, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202107143, November 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Female, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202004551, June 2020
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Other Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Other Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, March 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #201510925, December 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 18 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201104536, April 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 29 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201009365, July 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Handcuffs too tight Black Female, 48 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200913776, July 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 35 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 35 Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25589
Closed: 10/18/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous.
  2. Wrongfully used offensive language.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25590
Closed: 5/3/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully deactivated their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2016-16226
Closed: 8/9/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant and struck a motorcyclist.
  2. Guilty: While off-duty, wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by the consumption of alcohol and struck a motorcyclist.
  3. Guilty: While off-duty, wrongfully consumed an intoxicant to the extent that he was unfit for duty.
  4. Guilty: While off-duty, refused to submit to a chemical breath test.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (31 days), suspended w/o pay (14 days), vacation days (15 days)

Case: 2012-8756
Opened: 12/28/2012
Closed: 5/22/2013
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on dismissal probation, threatened to kill an individual known to the Department in violation of a valid court order of protection
  2. Guilty: While on dismissal probation, did repeatedly call and text said individual in violation of a valid court order of protection
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty-two (32) pre-trial suspension days.


Lawsuits

Walker, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV00500, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 4, 2015, ended June 27, 2017
Zero Disposition
Complaint, Second Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant officers in police vehicles approached Plaintiff while he was walking with a friend and arrested him, took him to the 73rd Precinct, and charged him with Possession of a Firearm. The case was dismissed after 5 court appearances.