Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2013-8776
Opened: 5/28/2013
Closed: 4/3/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, made inaccurate statements in an accident report-police Department vehicle (pd 301-153)
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, made inaccurate statement(s) in a police accident report (mv-104an)
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, was the recorder in an rmp involved in a vehicle accident and wrongfully prepared the accident report-police Department vehicle (pd 301-153) and the police accident report (mv-104an) himself
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, was the recorder in an rmp that was involved in a vehicle accident and failed to promptly inform central of the accident and take the rmp out of service
-
Guilty:
While on-duty and in New York county, was involved in a Department vehicle accident and failed to obtain the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all persons involved and witnesses and enter this information onto the police accident report (mv-104an) and the accident report-police Department vehicle (pd 301-153).
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, failed to conduct a proper investigation of a physical altercation that he "picked up"; failed to notify the central radio dispatcher of the "pick up"; failed to prepare a complaint report; and/or failed to prepare an aided report worksheet.
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, and in New York county, failed to make complete activity log entries.
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year; forfeiture of forty-five (45) vacation days
Case: 2011-5258
Opened: 7/27/2011
Closed: 4/16/2012
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Failed to conduct a proper investigation upon responding to an incident involving an off duty Member of Service
Penalty: Forfeiture of twenty -five (25) vacation days