Thomas E. Diggs

Badge #1683, Black Male, 51
Detective Grade 3 at Detective Bureau since December 2021
Service started January 2005, made $215,000 last year, Tax #936494

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-14904
Closed: 2/6/2016

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$22,500   Padilla, Nancy vs City of New York , et al., 2017 BCSC BCSC 027861/2017E
$950,000   H.,d., et al. vs The City of New York, et al., 2016 SDNY SDNY 16CV07698
$30,000   Quinonez, Roosevelt vs City of New York, et al., 2016 SDNY SDNY 16CV04275
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Complainant Unavailable
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201903814, May 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition)
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201303045, April 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201211835, August 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201210629, August 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: White Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, June 22, 2015
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 4 days
additional details

Complaint #201113082, October 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Female, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Female, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200915638, October 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200902458, February 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201903814, May 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition) Black Female, 45 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201303045, April 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Hispanic Male, 19 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201211835, August 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 38 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201210629, August 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) White Male, 45 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force White Male, 45 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, June 22, 2015
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 4 days
additional details
Complaint #201113082, October 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Female, 52 Complainant Unavailable
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 52 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 52 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Female, 52 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200915638, October 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 24 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200902458, February 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 18 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-14904
Closed: 2/6/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, failed and neglected to properly safeguard his off-duty firearm.
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 6 known lawsuits, $1,002,500 total settlements.

Padilla, Nancy vs City of New York , et al.
Case # 027861/2017E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 8, 2017, ended May 3, 2018
$22,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about June 8, 2016, on a street intersection, the Plaintiff was lawfully walking on the sidewalk with an acquaintance when two Defendant NYPD officers arrived in a vehicle, approached, questioned, searched, and detained Plaintiff and Plaintiff's acquaintance. During the period of detention, Plaintiff's phone rang. When Plaintiff went to answer her phone, a Defendant officer insinuated that Plaintiff was going to record the officers and "Now you're going in." Plaintiff was then improperly arrested and confined without knowledge a warrant or other legal justification. Plaintiff was transported to the precinct, where she was subjected to a strip search. Plaintiff was charged with crimes, which charges were e...

H.,d., et al. vs The City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV07698, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 3, 2016, ended April 10, 2019
$950,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint, Complaint
Description: Class action by LAS challenging the constitutionality of NYPL 240.37-Loitering for the Purposes of Engaging in a Prostitution Offense. Contact Cynthia for more information on the defendants.

Quinonez, Roosevelt vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV04275, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 10, 2016, ended December 15, 2016
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant officers approached Plaintiff, accused him of throwing something in a nearby trash, and then walked over to the trashcan and returned with a ziplock bag containing a small amount of crack cocaine. Officers arrested Plaintiff and charged him with possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree but due to many inconsistencies and changing stories in the officer's case, the charges were dismissed.

Chaar, Michelle vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 023058/2016E, Supreme Court - Bronx, May 11, 2016
Complaint
Description: On February 6, 2015, Officers Joel A. Gomez and Diggs approached the Plaintiff while she was walking down the street and arrested her without probable cause. At the time of the incident, the Plaintiff was struggling with a severe heroin addiction and engaged in prostitution to support her addiction. The Defendants knew the Plaintiff, as she had been arrested before. However, at the time of the incident, the Plaintiff did not have any drugs or paraphernalia on her person and informed the Defendants of this. The Defendants responded by saying, “Well, we know what you are doing,” and proceeded to arrest her anyway. At the precinct, the Plaintiff was repeatedly moved between the arrest room, where she was handcuff...

Rosado, Joaquin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 301030/2014, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 14, 2014

Paniagua v. City of New York
Case # 309159/2011, Supreme Court - Bronx
Complaint

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #201311157 and additional lawsuit 13CV5610