Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Hatcher, Shaquille, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 710933/2017,
Supreme Court - Queens, November 21, 2017, ended April 23, 2025
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On April 14, 2012, an individual was shot, with Defendant Detectives becoming involved with the investigation. Defendant Detective Hiddessen utilized NYPD procedures and systems to have an I-Card issued for Plaintiff Giles claiming to have probable cause for Plaintiff Giles' arrest based on false, erroneous, and/or misrepresented statements of Plaintiff Giles' involvement in the shooting. Defendant Hiddessen arrested Plaintiff Giles at his home without a warrant on April 15, 2012. On April 15, 2012, an I-Card was submitted for Plaintiff Hatcher. On the same day, Detective Hiddessen provided false, erroneous, and/or misrepresented information to the Queens County District Attorney's Office resulting in the initi...