Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Daniel P. Connelly
Badge #4212,
White Male
Police Officer at 103rd Precinct since September 2019
Service
started April 2018,
made $172,000 last year,
Tax #965694
Complaints
4
Complaints
8
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2
Complainant Unavailable
1
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202402364,
February 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
Complaint #202311008,
March 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
| Complainant: | Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202302302,
March 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Other |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #201901508,
February 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 22 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202402364, February 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Female, 35-39 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202311008, March 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 30-34 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Female, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202302302, March 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 60-64 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) | Female, 60-64 | Unfounded |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Female, 60-64 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Offensive Language: Other | Black Female, 60-64 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201901508, February 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 22 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Rhodes, Assata vs Richmond Towing Inc., et al.
Case # 516193/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, June 11, 2024, ended June 5, 2025
Zero Disposition
Olatunji-Ojo, Love vs City of Ny
Case # 700524/2023, Supreme Court - Queens, January 12, 2023
Complaint
Description: On or about September 16, 2022, at approximately 12:30 AM, Love Olatunji-Ojo was driving his moped motorcycle down the street in Queens, New York, approaching an intersection, when the Defendant NYPD P.O. Daniel Connelly accelerated his police vehicle past a red traffic light, unexpectedly, recklessly, and negligently, with the intention of stopping Mr. Olatunji-Ojo, and caused him to slam into the NYPD vehicle. The collision between Mr. Olatunji-Ojo and the Defendants P.O. Connelly and P.O. Matthew Neubauer was caused by the unexpected acceleration and sudden stop of Defendants' police vehicle past a red light. After the collision, the Defendants unlawfully and wrongfully searched Mr. Olatunji-Ojo and arreste...