Adelso Espinal
Badge #2596,
Hispanic Male
Service
started January 2016, ended October 2024,
Tax #960505
Complaints
2
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Complainant Unavailable
3
Unfounded
Complaint #202304538,
May 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #201906914,
July 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 23 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202304538, May 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number | Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201906914, July 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 23 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Almanzar, Smerlin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 816994/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 28, 2025
Wohl, Jonathan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 161878/2023, Supreme Court - New York, December 14, 2023
Complaint
Description: On September 9, 2022, plaintiff was arrested by the defendants at the Union Hall, where he was talking to a Local 79 employee and recording the conversation on his phone. Defendants took custody of plaintiff's work helmet, water bottle, calendar, all of which contain the phrase "Black Lives Matters" and plaintiff's cellular phone. Defendants claimed that plaintiff was trespassing at the Union Hall. They handcuffed him and took him to a precinct, where he was placed in a holding cell. Plaintiff was charged with Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree. Due to the conditions of the cell, plaintiff had panic attacks and chest pain. He did not receive clean drinking water even though requesting it. After severa...