Grady Langston

Badge #5098, Black Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at Force Investigation Division
Service started February 1994, ended February 2019, Tax #906605

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Pepper spray

Complaints

3 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200601269, September 2005
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Black Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200204798, July 2002
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9905456, November 1999
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun pointed/gun drawn
Complainant: Black Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200601269, September 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray Black Male, 40 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40 Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200204798, July 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Black Male, 24 Exonerated
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 32 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 32 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Black Male, 24 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9905456, November 1999
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 31 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Black Male, 31 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Gun pointed/gun drawn Black Female, 33 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Dash v. Montas et al
Case # 17CV00515, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Complaint
Description: Before the incident date, defendants were investigating a number of commercial robberies in Bedford Stuyvesant, Kings County in April 2015. On the incident date, the plaintiff was arrested, imprisoned, and later gave a false and coerced written confession. Defendant Det. Montas told the plaintiff that he would get shot unless he wrote a confession under Montas' guidance. This confession led to the plaintiff's unlawful arrest. The plaintiff was acquitted of all charges after 17 months in jail.