Brendan J. Mclaughlin

Brendan J. Mclaughlin

Brendan J. Mclaughlin
Badge #5001, White Male
Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx Neighborhood Safety Team, 43rd Precinct, 47th Precinct
Service started October 2018, made $159,000 last year, Tax #966705

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Discourtesy: Action

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26759
Closed: 3/14/2024

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$95,000   Santana, Daniel vs City of Ny, 2022 BCSC BCSC 816469/2022E
$295,000   Marguez, Raymond vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 814090/2021E
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
12 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202601095, February 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202408198, August 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202302205, March 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202102262, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202601095, February 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202408198, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Puerto Rican Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Puerto Rican Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Puerto Rican Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202302205, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Action Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202102262, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26759
Closed: 3/14/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  2. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $390,000 total settlements.

Cepeda, Julian vs City of Ny
Case # 800580/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 7, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about October 14, 2022, Plaintiff Julian Cepeda was a lawful passenger in a motor vehicle at the rear of 2245 Randall Avenue, Bronx, NY at approximately 9:14 P.M., when the Defendants--NYPD Police Officers Daniel Ramos, Brandon Rushie, and Sergeant Brendan McLaughlin--illegally and unconstitutionally stopped the vehicle. There was no legal justification or provocation from the Plaintiff or the vehicle's passenger that indicated a need for the stop. Defendants then proceeded to assault, accost, batter, search, illegally question, and arrest Plaintiff. Defendants injured the Plaintiff to the point in which he was unable to move freely or leave the scene without him being notified as to why he was being arr...

Santana, Daniel vs City of Ny
Case # 816469/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 4, 2022, ended April 10, 2023
$95,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 4, 2022, police officers James Murphy, Brendan McLaughlin, Paul O'Grady, John Doe and John Roe stopped, seized and arrested Plaintiff in an aggressive and excessive manner without any legal justification. Plaintiff was arraigned and maliciously prosecuted with committing a crime. Plaintiff was incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances until all charges against him were dismissed.

Marguez, Raymond vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 814090/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 18, 2021, ended April 27, 2022
$295,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 15, 2021, defendant POs approached plaintiff for no reason and summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered and detained him when he was in the vicinity of 1719 Cross Bronx Expressway. Plaintiff was subject to a strip search while in the custody of defendants. Plaintiff was incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated favorably.