Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Michael Hartman
Badge #1855,
White Male
Also served at
101st Precinct
Service
started January 1995, ended July 2020,
Tax #914805
Complaints
3
Complaints
5
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
2
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #201500699,
January 2015
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 46 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Other |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 46 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #200717482,
December 2007
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 42 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - B |
Complaint #200709836,
July 2007
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 22 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 22 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #201500699, January 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Black Male, 46 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Offensive Language: Other | Black Male, 46 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200717482, December 2007 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint | Black Male, 42 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - B | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200709836, July 2007 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 22 | Unsubstantiated |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Female, 22 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.