Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $53,000 total settlements.
Davis, Andre vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV04684,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 22, 2015, ended June 11, 2018
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
Amended Complaint,
Complaint,
Second Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant officers approached and arrested plaintiff using excessive force. Plaintiff was brought to the hospital in handcuffs and then released without being charged with a crime.
Riedemonn, Precious Nicole vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159078/2015,
Supreme Court - New York, September 8, 2015, ended May 5, 2017
$19,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 27, 2014, Plaintiff was accused of shoplifting in a Target and two New York City Police officers were called to search, handcuff, and take her to the 75th precinct. There, Defendant P.O. Ramos processed Plaintiff, during which time he verbally harassed and sexually assaulted her by showing her an explicit photo on his cellphone and making taunting remarks, including a request for her to "show him 'something'". Defendant P.O. Ramos also asked her to write down her cellphone number, which he later called multiple times on or about July 3rd and 11th after she had been released. Plaintiff sustained serious emotional distress as a result.
Herrera, Edward vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV01431,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 18, 2015, ended November 19, 2015
$34,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendants unlawfully arrested plaintiff and used excessive force leaving plaintiff with serious injuries during the illegal arrest . Defendants violated plaintiff's rights when they entered his home without a warrant or consent.