James R. Palumbo

James R. Palumbo

James R. Palumbo
Former Deputy Chief at Patrol Borough Brooklyn South
Also served at 68th Precinct, 70th Precinct
Service started September 2000, ended March 2026, Tax #927315
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force

Lawsuit Settlements:
$95,000   Augustin, Thomas vs City of New York, et al., 2013 KCSC KCSC 015892/2013
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
8 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
2 Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202501000, October 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details

Complaint #202200788, June 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, July 10, 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #201303892, May 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200201458, February 2002
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200102026, March 2001
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202501000, October 2023
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
Discourtesy: Action Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details
Complaint #202200788, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, July 10, 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #201303892, May 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 41 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 28 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200201458, February 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 39 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200102026, March 2001
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 14 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Augustin, Thomas vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 015892/2013, Supreme Court - Kings, September 17, 2013, ended April 23, 2018
$95,000 Settlement

Other Documents