Jason M. Ciota

Jason M. Ciota

Jason M. Ciota
Badge #2831, White Male
Sergeant at 104th Precinct since November 2021
Service started January 2012, made $130,000 last year, Tax #951615

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$10,000   Christmas, Raymond vs City of New York, et al., 2014 KCSC KCSC 000920/2014
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
5 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202410418, October 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: White Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202400133, December 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202304545, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202205647, August 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 3, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202410418, October 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged White Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202400133, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Hispanic Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202304545, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202205647, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 45-49 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Hispanic Female, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 3, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Christmas, Raymond vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 000920/2014, Supreme Court - Kings, January 28, 2014, ended June 16, 2015
$10,000 Settlement

Other Documents