David J. Belkin

David J. Belkin

David J. Belkin
Badge #7708, White Male, 36
Police Officer at 63rd Precinct since February 2017
Service started January 2016, made $156,000 last year, Tax #960225

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint

Complaints

7 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Exonerated
2 OMB PEG Directive Closure
1 SRAD Closure
1 Unable to Determine
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202505702, June 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202404546, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202400892, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Age 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202311974, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202307207, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201807163, August 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Asian Female, 54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201708493, October 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202505702, June 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 60-64 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202404546, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202400892, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Age 60-64 OMB PEG Directive Closure
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 60-64 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202311974, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202307207, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201807163, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Asian Female, 54 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201708493, October 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 20 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 20 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Greenidge Jr., Christopher Michael vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 534495/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, December 24, 2024

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #201610388