Wilver O. Diazzabala
Badge #10181,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 6th Precinct since April 2023
Service
started October 2022,
made $89,800 last year,
Tax #975435
Complaints
2
Complaints
4
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Complaint Withdrawn
3
SRAD Closure
Complaint #202606731,
June 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202306991,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Complaint #202606731, June 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | SRAD Closure | |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | SRAD Closure | |
| Discourtesy: Action | SRAD Closure | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202306991, July 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Black Male, 25-29 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Hurt, Destiny vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 160235/2024, Supreme Court - New York, December 24, 2024
Complaint
Description: On August 12, 2023, Plaintiff was in the park speaking about her religious beliefs and offering religious materials to passersby, when she was unlawfully approached by Defendant NYPD officers Maric, Gomez, Fermin, Jones, Vitale, Diazzabala, and other unknown NYPD officers, without any legal basis. The Defendants told Plaintiff that her "umbrella" was against park regulations. Plaintiff had been in the park numerous times previously and had been told that it was legal to be there. The Defendants surrounded Plaintiff and attempted to confiscate her umbrella. They verbally seized, detained, assaulted, and threatened her. The Defendants began to attack, touch, grab, pull, restrain, kick, scratch, and detain Plainti...