Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word
Michael R. Milone
Badge #21050,
White Male
Police Officer at Special Victims Division Zone 1 since June 2023
Also served at
40th Precinct
Service
started July 2015,
made $135,000 last year,
Tax #958935
Lawsuit settlements:
$17,500 Navarro, Pedro vs City of New York, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 804601/2021E
View Details
$17,500 Navarro, Pedro vs City of New York, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 804601/2021E
View Details
Complaints
3
Complaints
7
Allegations
3
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
2
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202301140,
January 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202300622,
January 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202101172,
February 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Complaint #202301140, January 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation | Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202300622, January 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202101172, February 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 21-24 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2020-21696
Closed: 2/27/2020
Case Details:
- Guilty: Wrongful used physical force.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)
Lawsuits
Navarro, Pedro vs City of New York, et al.Case # 804601/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 6, 2021, ended October 11, 2023
$17,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 15, 2019, Plaintiff, a Latino or Hispanic male, was walking down the street when POs including MCIVER, CALLE, MILONE, approached Plaintiff and told Plaintiff to drop what he was holding. Plaintiff dropped all of the items in his grasp putting up no physical resistance. POs violently contorted Plaintiff’s arms behind his back and handcuffed him in excessively tight fashion. Plaintiff was unlawfully arrested and detained over the course of eighteen hours. Plaintiff was removed to the precinct where Plaintiff was subjected to a strip search and invasive cavity inspection. MCIVER signed a criminal complaint against Plaintiff, in which he knowingly affirmed the truth of the fabricated allegations against Pl...