Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Discourtesy: Word
Michael R. Milone
Badge #1118,
White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Bronx Special Victims Squad since December 2024
Service
started July 2015,
made $178,000 last year,
Tax #958935
Lawsuit Settlements:
$17,500 Navarro, Pedro vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 804601/2021E
View Details
$17,500 Navarro, Pedro vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 804601/2021E
View Details
Complaints
4
Complaints
9
Allegations
3
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
2
SRAD Closure
2
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202506050,
May 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202301140,
January 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Guilty |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Guilty |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Not guilty |
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: | Suspension 15 days |
| APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 20 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, April 23, 2026 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 20 days |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #202300622,
January 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202101172,
February 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Complaint #202506050, May 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 40-44 | SRAD Closure |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 40-44 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202301140, January 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty | ||
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty | ||
| Force: Physical force | Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation | Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty | ||
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: Suspension 15 days | ||
| APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 20 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, April 23, 2026 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 20 days | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202300622, January 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202101172, February 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 21-24 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2020-21696
Closed: 2/27/2020
Case Details:
- Guilty: Wrongful used physical force.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $17,500 total settlements.Cruzatty, Paolo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 803286/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 27, 2024
Complaint
Description: On January 27, 2023, while the plaintiff was operating a motorized scooter, NYPD officers including Kelvin Winters, Michael Milone, Edison Taveras, and Muhammad Malik, Tashida Wilson, Brian Flynn followed the plaintiff and struck him with their vehicle, causing severe fractures to the plaintiff's lower left leg. After the collision, the NYPD officers violently assaulted and battered the plaintiff. The defendants also refused to call an ambulance despite knowing that the plaintiff's leg was broken and that the plaintiff was suffering severe pain.
Navarro, Pedro vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804601/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 6, 2021, ended October 11, 2023
$17,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 15, 2019, Plaintiff, a Latino or Hispanic male, was walking down the street when POs including MCIVER, CALLE, MILONE, approached Plaintiff and told Plaintiff to drop what he was holding. Plaintiff dropped all of the items in his grasp putting up no physical resistance. POs violently contorted Plaintiff’s arms behind his back and handcuffed him in excessively tight fashion. Plaintiff was unlawfully arrested and detained over the course of eighteen hours. Plaintiff was removed to the precinct where Plaintiff was subjected to a strip search and invasive cavity inspection. MCIVER signed a criminal complaint against Plaintiff, in which he knowingly affirmed the truth of the fabricated allegations against Pl...