Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
Charles Cadiz
Badge #3827,
Hispanic Male
Also served at
49th Precinct
Service
started July 2005, ended October 2022,
Tax #938145
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Unfounded
2
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #201113788,
October 2011
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 58 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #201017547,
December 2010
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 14 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #200811205,
August 2008
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 58 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #201113788, October 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched | Substantiated (Charges) | |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Female, 58 | Unsubstantiated |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201017547, December 2010 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Chokehold | Black Female, 14 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200811205, August 2008 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number | Hispanic Male, 58 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2010-1563
Closed: 1/5/2011
Case Details:
- Guilty: Wrongfully issued a summons to an individual known to the Department who did not provide identification and was undomiciled.
- Guilty: Failed to request a Patrol Supervisor to the scene of a police incident.
- Guilty: Failed to obtain permission from Patrol Supervisor to transport an arrestee to an address where arrestee claimed to reside.
- Guilty: Failed to notify radio dispatch when placing arrestee in a patrol car and subsequently released arrestee on the street.
- Guilty: Failed to make proper activity logs.
- Guilty: Failed to conduct a warrant check pursuant to issuing a criminal court summons.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Trec, Dorota, et Al vs Police Department, Nyc, et al.
Case # 004069/2015, Supreme Court - Kings, April 2, 2015, ended March 9, 2018
Administrative Closing
Trec, Dorota, et Al vs Brooklyn District Attorney, et al.
Case # 003170/2015, Supreme Court - Kings, March 19, 2015, ended January 10, 2018
Zero Disposition