Stephen M. Schmitt

Stephen M. Schmitt

Stephen M. Schmitt
Badge #3566, White Male, 33
Detective Grade 3 at 113th Precinct Detective Squad since January 2020
Also served at 71st Precinct
Service started January 2014, made $157,000 last year, Tax #956245

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2019-20784
Closed: 10/25/2022
Case: 2019-21560
Closed: 4/14/2022

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
2 Exonerated
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202103309, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201900799, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201810357, December 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201703835, May 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202103309, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Female, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Female, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201900799, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 33 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 33 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 33 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 33 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201810357, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201703835, May 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 35 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2019-20784
Closed: 10/25/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare memo book.
  2. Improper frisk.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2019-21560
Closed: 4/14/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare report.
  2. Failed to provide business card.
  3. Improper usage of Department equipment
Penalty: Instructions
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Skrine, Raheem vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 525260/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, September 27, 2022
Complaint
Description: On August 30, 2019, Plaintiff was lawfully present in the vicinity of 137 Sterling Street, Brooklyn when defendants police officers, including STEPHEN SCHMITT, JOSEPH NICOLETTI and DANIEL GUIDA unlawfully stopped, questioned, frisked, searched, falsely arrested, and subjected plaintiff to the use of excessive force, without probable cause or any legal justification. Defendants placed him in a headlock causing him difficulty to breath and applied very tight handcuffs. Plaintiff was transported to the 71st Precinct whereat he was unlawfully searched, fingerprinted, photographed, and detained in a filthy holding cell for approximately 7-8 hours and moved to the central booking. Plaintiff was maliciously prosecu...

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #202001886