Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2021-23951
Closed: 2/9/2023
Case Details:
-
Threatened to arrest a person known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Avila, Panton vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 506919/2021,
Supreme Court - Kings, March 30, 2021, ended February 2, 2024
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 9, 2018, police officers Simon Rashid, Toniann Groth, Frederick Manney, and John Doe stopped Plaintiff's motor vehicle without any probable cause or reasonable suspicion for doing so. Despite the absence of illegal activity, PO questioned and searched Plaintiff's car without consent nor any lawful justification. PO then violently arrested Plaintiff and handcuffed him in an excessively tight fashion, causing Plaintiff to suffer physical pain. Plaintiff was taken to the police facility where he was fingerprinted and strip-searched. PO falsely claimed that Plaintiff was pulled over due to "excessively tinted windows" and that an alleged firearm was found in plain view. Plaintiff was never in actual pos...