Toniann Groth

Toniann Groth

Toniann Groth
Badge #3611, White Female
Sergeant at Detective Bureau Hate Crimes Task Force since November 2024
Service started January 2015, made $149,000 last year, Tax #957645

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest (3)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-23951
Closed: 2/9/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$25,000   Avila, Panton vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 KCSC KCSC 506919/2021
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202408745, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Gun fired
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202312045, November 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Puerto Rican Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Puerto Rican Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Puerto Rican Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202403054, September 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201907401, August 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, October 6, 2022
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202408745, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun fired Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202312045, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Puerto Rican Female, 65-69 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Puerto Rican Female, 65-69 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Puerto Rican Female, 65-69 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202403054, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201907401, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, October 6, 2022
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-23951
Closed: 2/9/2023
Case Details:
  1. Threatened to arrest a person known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Avila, Panton vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 506919/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, March 30, 2021, ended February 2, 2024
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 9, 2018, police officers Simon Rashid, Toniann Groth, Frederick Manney, and John Doe stopped Plaintiff's motor vehicle without any probable cause or reasonable suspicion for doing so. Despite the absence of illegal activity, PO questioned and searched Plaintiff's car without consent nor any lawful justification. PO then violently arrested Plaintiff and handcuffed him in an excessively tight fashion, causing Plaintiff to suffer physical pain. Plaintiff was taken to the police facility where he was fingerprinted and strip-searched. PO falsely claimed that Plaintiff was pulled over due to "excessively tinted windows" and that an alleged firearm was found in plain view. Plaintiff was never in actual pos...

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #201904853