Andrew K. Lau

Badge #29282, Asian Male
Police Officer at 94th Precinct since September 2020, active
Service started January 2018, made $63,300 last year, Tax #965255

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22434
Closed: 8/1/2022

View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
3 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded

Complaint #201906594, July 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201906594, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Hispanic Female, 20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 22 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 22 Exonerated
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22434
Closed: 8/1/2022
Case Details:
  1. Improper frisk of an individual
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Duran, Emily vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 502534/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, February 4, 2021

Other Documents