Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Muzli Kastrati
Badge #16689,
White Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 3 since June 2020
Service
started October 2018,
made $71,600 last year,
Tax #966655
Complaints
2
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Unable to Determine
3
Unfounded
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202208724,
December 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #202208649,
December 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202208724, December 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202208649, December 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Discourtesy: Action | Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2024-30441
Closed: 5/12/2024
Case Details:
- Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Morel, Dionny vs City of New York, et al.Case # 161187/2023, Supreme Court - New York, January 6, 2023