Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2015-14878
Closed: 12/14/2015
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While off-duty, after being involved in a police incident, failed and neglected to immediately notify the operations unit, as required.
-
Guilty:
While off-duty, operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by an intoxicant.
-
Guilty:
While off-duty, refused to submit to a breathalyzer test.
-
Guilty:
While off-duty, wrongfully consumed an intoxicant to the extent that said Police Officer was unfit for duty.
-
Guilty:
While off-duty, wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (31 days), vacation days (15 days)
Moore, Ali vs City of Ny , et al.
Case # 22CV10957,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 9, 2023, ended April 30, 2026
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On or about October 1, 2021, Plaintiff was present at his then residence when NYCHA contacted 911 emergency services. When PO and FD officers (their identities were unknown at the time the complaint was filed) arrived, Plaintiff was outside the apartment building in which he resided. At the time the officers came into contact with Plaintiff, he was not a threat to himself or anyone else. The officers approached Plaintiff aggressively, encircled him, and handcuffed him. The manner in which the officers sought to take custody of Plaintiff was unnecessary. The officers had no basis to seize Plaintiff and lacked probable cause. Once Plaintiff was in custody, the officers transported him to the hospital. Once at the...