Douglas J. Connolly

Douglas J. Connolly

Douglas J. Connolly
Badge #7786, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since November 2017, active
Also served at 81st Precinct
Service started July 2013, made $140,000 last year, Tax #954665

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27925
Closed: 3/2/2023
Case: 2022-25864
Closed: 9/14/2022

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
13 Allegations
0 Substantiated
7 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202100697, January 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201903283, April 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201903571, April 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201705935, July 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201701255, February 2017
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201606639, July 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202100697, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Female, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Female, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201903283, April 2019
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201903571, April 2019
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201705935, July 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201701255, February 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 36 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201606639, July 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 31 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 31 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27925
Closed: 3/2/2023
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Made improper contact/communications harassment
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully disseminated confidential Department information
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (25 days)

Case: 2022-25864
Closed: 9/14/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to terminate a vehicle pursuit
Penalty: B - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B