Christopher M. Diaz

Badge #6191, Hispanic Male
Detective Grade 3 at 24th Precinct Detective Squad since June 2020
Also served at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Impact Response Team, 24th Precinct
Service started January 2008, made $176,000 last year, Tax #945665

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property

Complaints

10 Complaints
14 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202202261, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Black, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202103553, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, October 28, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202102999, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201901567, February 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201706318, August 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201705119, June 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201602250, March 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201016794, December 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201001414, October 2009
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200900781, January 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202202261, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Black, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Offensive Language: Gender Black, 25-29 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202103553, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, October 28, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202102999, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Female, 55-59 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 55-59 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201901567, February 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 24 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201706318, August 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201705119, June 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 20 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201602250, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201016794, December 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 43 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201001414, October 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Hispanic Male, 46 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200900781, January 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 38 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Beck, Jeanine L. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV09231, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 14, 2013, ended January 6, 2014
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On March 31, 2012, PO Stephen Collier’s NYPD motor vehicle collided with a vehicle operated by Plaintiff. The NYPD vehicle was a marked police car, but the lights and sirens were not in operation. The occurrence and the resultant injuries sustained by Plaintiff were caused solely by and through the negligence, carelessness, recklessness and wanton disregard on the part of the defendants. Plaintiff, who was in no way negligent, was caused to sustain serious and severe personal injuries. Hours after the accident, either late in the night on March 31, 2012 or early in the morning on April 1, 2012, Plaintiff was issued summons alleging that Plaintiff’s vehicle was unregistered for a period over sixty days, and th...

Other Documents

Employment History Summary