Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Joseph I. Locurto
Badge #23024,
White Male
Service
started July 2013,
made $133,000 last year,
Tax #955075
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
Complaint #202204323,
June 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons |
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #201706175,
July 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202204323, June 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Asian Male, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons | Asian Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201706175, July 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Lawsuits
Melo, Angelica vs City of New YorkCase # 154783/2017, Supreme Court - New York, May 24, 2017