Douglas M. Schack

Douglas M. Schack

Douglas M. Schack
Lieutenant at 72nd Precinct since December 2019, active
Service started July 2002, made $196,000 last year, Tax #931175
Hispanic Male, 44

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Offensive Language: Other

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29001
Closed: 12/12/2023

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$55,001   Penley, Alexander vs City of New York, et al., 2014 SDNY SDNY 14CV01577
$5,000   Ortiz et al v. The City of New York et al, SDNY SDNY 10CV08999
View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
17 Allegations
5 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
2 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202207280, June 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202106029, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201905049, May 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: White Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201806962, August 2018
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: White Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
Complainant: White Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200917744, November 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 63
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 63
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200701300, January 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Complainant: White Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200612653, September 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200405339, June 2004
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202207280, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Hispanic Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202106029, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording White Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201905049, May 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property White Male, 39 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201806962, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other White Male, 50 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Offensive Language: Ethnicity White Male, 50 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200917744, November 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 63 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 63 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200701300, January 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest White Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200612653, September 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 24 Unfounded
Force: Physical force White Male, 24 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200405339, June 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 33 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29001
Closed: 12/12/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $60,001 total settlements.

Grytsyk, Petro vs P.O. Morales, Anthony, et al.
Case # 19CV03470, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 17, 2019
Complaint
Description: On April 18, 2016, plaintiff and his wife were legally selling artworks on a Times Square sidewalk when the latter was issued a summons by Defendant P.O. Morales, returnable at Criminal Court. Plaintiff pointed out to Morales that their conduct was not illegal and that the summons should instead be returnable at the NYC Environmental Control Board, and Morales brought over Defendant Lieutenant Khan, who ordered Plaintiff to close down his vendor display. When Plaintiff protested that this decision had to be left to a judge, Khan ordered Morales to arrest him. Morales complied, charging Plaintiff with obstruction of governmental administration and disorderly conduct. Morales handcuffed Plaintiff excessively tigh...

Penley, Alexander vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV01577, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 28, 2014, ended December 29, 2014
$55,001 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 14, 2012, the Plaintiff, an international lawyer, was falsely arrested and beaten outside of a political event by the PO's on the felony charges of a crime. Nearly 24 hrs later, the Plaintiff was released from custody. Six months later, a grand jury voted to dismiss all the charges. On June 12, 2012, the Plaintiff being locked out of his apartment was arrested again on criminal mischief for destroying a door. 24hr later, the Plaintiff was released. Seven months later, a grand jury voted to dismiss all the charges. On January 11, 2012, the Plaintff was arrested in Virginia on the arrest warrant from June 12, 2012. The plaintiff was held in jail for 5 days and released. 17 days later, the bogus warrant...

Ortiz et al v. The City of New York et al
Case # 10CV08999, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$5,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint
Description: Ortiz was in his apt sleeping when the defendants loudly knocked on and kicked in door; defendants shouted for him to "get on the fucking floor" and took them into custody without lawful basis; took the plaintiffs to the 9th pct, while the other defendants rampaged through the plaintiff's apt (did not find any drugs etc).

Other Documents