Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $2,000 total settlements.
Croskey, Kashiff vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 154126/2022E,
Supreme Court - New York, May 17, 2022
Complaint
Description: Note: this complaint contains no particulars of the how, by whom and where the alleged torts were conducted other than by general reference to a date and conduct. The city filed a demand for particulars which appears to have gone unanswered. The following are the causes of action listed by the Plaintiff, followed by the NYPD officers named in the complaint.
On September 17, 2020, the NYPD Defendants wrongfully and falsely accused the Plaintiff of Attempted Tampering with Physical Evidence. The Plaintiff was detained without probable cause and held at the 30th Precinct and later at the 42nd Precinct. The Plaintiff was unlawfully searched and strip searched. The NYPD Defendants provided false and/or incomplete ...
Pabon, Ruben vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV04544,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 8, 2015, ended January 25, 2017
$2,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint,
Complaint,
Original Complaint
Description: Officers approached Plaintiff in a deli, asked for ID, told him there was a warrant for his arrest, handcuffed him, and brought him to the 90th Precinct, where he was told there was no warrant for his arrest. Instead, there was an i-card from the 79th Precinct. Defendant Officer Tischler told Plaintiff that he was identified as a witness to a shooting and Plaintiff invoked his right to counsel. Plaintiff was then kept at the precinct overnight, brought to Central Booking, and then released without arraignment because the DA declined to prosecute the case.
Hamilton, Michael vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 301271/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 14, 2014, ended April 25, 2016
Zero Disposition