Roberto Almanzar

Roberto Almanzar

Roberto Almanzar
Badge #23371, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 34th Precinct since December 2025
Also served at 28th Precinct
Service started November 2020, Tax #969475

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Discourtesy: Word
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28963
Closed: 1/20/2024

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
15 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
7 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202306483, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202305398, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202302512, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202206095, July 2022
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, January 15, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
CCRB Annual Report
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202200909, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202306483, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202305398, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202302512, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202206095, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, January 15, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
CCRB Annual Report
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details
Complaint #202200909, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Female, 21-24 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28963
Closed: 1/20/2024
Case Details:
  1. Made false statements during a civilian complaint review board interview.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Grant, Raheim J. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 157936/2025, Supreme Court - New York, July 3, 2025

Watts, Trevor vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 160688/2022, Supreme Court - New York, December 20, 2022
Complaint
Description: On January 3, 2022, at approximately 10:00 p.m., the Plaintiff, Trevor Watts, was lawfully at the location of 95 Lenox Avenue 2nd Floor in New York County, within the State of New York, as he was returning home from walking his dog and had exited the elevator on the 2nd floor when he encountered “Willie,” a neighbor who is homeless. Mr. Watts asked “Willie” whether he was okay and if he wanted something to eat. “Willie” responded “yes.” Mr. Watts told “Willie” to wait while he retrieves his bags. Before returning from his apartment, Mr. Watts heard a commotion in the hallway and observed the Defendants, NYPD Police Officers, Almanzar (Tax ID #969475) of the 28TH Precinct, and Police Officers John Doe #s 1-4 ...