Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Vicente F. Vivar
Badge #4651,
Hispanic Male, 43
Detective Specialist at 105th Precinct since September 2012
Service
started July 2010,
made $158,000 last year,
Tax #949775
Complaints
2
Complaints
9
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Exonerated
1
Unable to Determine
2
Unsubstantiated
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202203036,
May 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #201605058,
June 2016
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
| Complainant: | Asian Male, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Penalty: | Formalized Training |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202203036, May 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 15-17 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 15-17 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 15-17 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201605058, June 2016 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Asian Male, 39 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Asian Male, 39 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Asian Male, 39 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Asian Male, 39 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | Asian Male, 39 | Exonerated |
| Penalty: Formalized Training | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-26818
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
- Computer misuse with dissemination
- Computer misuse.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline
Recommendation: No disciplinary action
Lawsuits
Achary, Jagannadhan vs Achary, Varsha, et al.Case # 700397/2025, Supreme Court - Queens, January 30, 2025