Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $82,500 total settlements.
Campbell, June, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV01786,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 15, 2015, ended February 23, 2016
$37,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiffs were falsely arrested and taken into custody without probable cause .
Bethea, Vaughan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV02134,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 4, 2014, ended October 17, 2014
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 3, 2013, Detective Anthony Desposito, and John and Jane Doe 1-10 (the names John and Jane Doe are fictitious, as the true names of these officers were unknown at the time of the complaint), approached Plaintiff and unlawfully demanded his identification. Plaintiff complied and produced his identification. Officers then unlawfully searched Plaintiff; no contraband was recovered. Plaintiff was handcuffed and taken to the precinct without legal basis. At the precinct, officers unlawfully conducted a strip search of Plaintiff. Again, no contraband was recovered. Nevertheless, police officers falsely informed employees of the DA’s Office that they had observed Plaintiff in criminal possession of a contro...
Crockett, Gregory vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 161857/2013,
Supreme Court - New York, December 31, 2013
Complaint
Description: On December 13, 2011, plaintiff was charged in New York Supreme Court with conspiracy, criminal possession of a weapon, criminal possession of a controlled substance, unlawful possession of marijuana, and criminally using drug paraphernalia. Defendant Desposito spearheaded the investigation into plaintiff's prosecution. Desposito made knowingly false verbal representations to the New York DA regarding plaintiffs connection to a house in which illegal drugs and weapons were recovered. Desposito repeated false representations in testimony before a Grand Jury. Plaintiff was indicted on criminal charges. On December 14, 2011, plaintiff was arrested. Plaintiff was forcibly confined and imprisoned for a period of twe...