Kharl O. Pinnock

Kharl O. Pinnock

Kharl O. Pinnock
Badge #7446, Black Male
Detective Specialist at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Community Affairs Section since March 2023, active
Service started July 2003, made $164,000 last year, Tax #933185

Lawsuit settlements:
$19,250   Baker, Justin vs City of New York, et al., 2017 EDNY EDNY 17CV04493
$66,500   Williams, Joshua Lee, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV02900
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202303250, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201409054, September 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201407230, July 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201305041, June 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201015037, October 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200606665, February 2006
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202303250, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 55-59 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201409054, September 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 49 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201407230, July 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 18 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201305041, June 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 26 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201015037, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 27 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200606665, February 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 24 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $85,750 total settlements.

Baker, Justin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV04493, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 9, 2017, ended July 30, 2018
$19,250 Settlement

Williams, Joshua Lee, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV02900, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 17, 2015, ended June 30, 2016
$66,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officer Pinnock stopped Plaintiffs while they were walking home, accused one of urinating on the street, and then proceeded to attack Plaintiff 1 and was aided in his assault by other Defendant Officers, who yelled discriminatory comments, and then proceeded to assault Plaintiffs 2 and 3 as well. Plaintiffs 2 and 3 were charged with OCA which was ACD'd and Plaintiff 1 was charged with public urination and resisting arrest, which were dismissed because it could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Curillo, Ciro vs New York City Police Department, et al.
Case # 030374/2008, Supreme Court - Kings, November 7, 2008, ended April 5, 2013
Administrative Closing

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 10/28/2013