Kharl O. Pinnock

Kharl O. Pinnock

Kharl O. Pinnock
Badge #7446, Black Male
Detective Specialist at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Community Affairs Section since March 2023, active
Service started July 2003, made $164,000 last year, Tax #933185

Lawsuit settlements:
$66,500   Williams, Joshua Lee, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV02900
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201409054, September 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201407230, July 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201305041, June 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201015037, October 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200606665, February 2006
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201409054, September 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 49 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201407230, July 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 18 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201305041, June 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 26 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201015037, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 27 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200606665, February 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 24 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Williams, Joshua Lee, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV02900, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 17, 2015, ended June 30, 2016
$66,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officer Pinnock stopped Plaintiffs while they were walking home, accused one of urinating on the street, and then proceeded to attack Plaintiff 1 and was aided in his assault by other Defendant Officers, who yelled discriminatory comments, and then proceeded to assault Plaintiffs 2 and 3 as well. Plaintiffs 2 and 3 were charged with OCA which was ACD'd and Plaintiff 1 was charged with public urination and resisting arrest, which were dismissed because it could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 10/28/2013