Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $150,000 total settlements.
Sidibeh, Saibo, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 811246/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, May 22, 2025
Cuello, Jesus vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 804826/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 3, 2025
Millan, Richard vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 819021/2024E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 3, 2024
Dejesus, Angel, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 819987/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 18, 2023, ended November 8, 2024
$150,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 13, 2023, at 9:30 pm, officer Kevin Doyle and two more unknown officers approached the plaintiffs who were lawfully in the vicinity of University Avenue and West Tremont Avenue in the County of Bronx, New York, for no reason other than their age and/or race. The officers stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, handcuffed and detained them in an aggressive and excessive manner. The plaintiffs were arraigned after their arrest and thereafter falsely and maliciously prosecuted with committing a crime. The plaintiffs remained incarcerated for over 24 hours and were required to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against them were terminated favorably...