Jose M. Genao

Badge #12747, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 48th Precinct since July 2008, active
Service started July 2007, made $109,000 last year, Tax #945195

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201111225, August 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201103224, March 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201008846, June 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200918158, November 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201111225, August 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 15 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201103224, March 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 37 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 39 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201008846, June 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200918158, November 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.