Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera (2)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera (2)
Christopher J. Brussell
Badge #22960,
White Male
Police Officer at 113th Precinct since September 2021
Also served at
100th Precinct
Service
started October 2019,
made $113,000 last year,
Tax #968295
Complaints
3
Complaints
7
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202403315,
April 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
Complaint #202307084,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202301436,
February 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number |
| Complainant: | Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202403315, April 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202307084, July 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202301436, February 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Female, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Female, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number | Female, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 45-49 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.