Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Jeffrey T. Farrell
Badge #1691,
White Male
Sergeant at 83rd Precinct since March 2022
Also served at
62nd Precinct
Service
started July 2011,
made $134,000 last year,
Tax #950395
Complaints
2
Complaints
10
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Unable to Determine
3
Unfounded
5
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202502156,
April 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202303473,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202502156, April 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Female, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Black Female, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303473, April 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint | Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 21-24 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest | Male, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Benoit, Nadege vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 522940/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, December 17, 2024
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff’s mother had been staying with her in Plaintiff’s apartment, along with Plaintiff’s 4 children and Plaintiff’s partner. Plaintiff’s mother became depressed after her home burned down, her hair salon went out of business, her husband passed away and her son was murdered in a short period of time. Plaintiff and her mother got into several arguments about leaving food around their home to rot, and Plaintiff’s mother began making false police reports against Plaintiff and other members of the family. On August 23, 2021, Plaintiff’s mother gave Plaintiff’s children candy, even though she was asked not to. At around 12PM, Plaintiff called the police and when they arrived, she asked them to speak with her ...