Donnamarie John

Badge #17341, Black Female
Former Police Officer at 70th Precinct
Service started April 1991, ended November 2020, Tax #899395

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun pointed


Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Instructions)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded

Complaint #201402734, March 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #9601133, March 1996
Allegation: Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Instructions)
additional details

Complaint #9504683, October 1995
Allegation: Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201402734, March 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 41 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 41 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #9601133, March 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun pointed Substantiated (Instructions)
additional details
Complaint #9504683, October 1995
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Beat Exonerated
Force: Other - Force Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11536
Opened: 5/20/2014
Closed: 4/28/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: During an official dept. Investigation wrongfully made misleading statements to wit: denied being married to an individual to whom she is legally married.
  2. Guilty: During an official dept. Investigation wrongfully made misleading statements to wit: denied being married to an individual to whom she is legally married.
Penalty: Forfeiture of twenty (20) vacation days