Michael C. Blanda
Badge #3961,
White Male
Sergeant at 101st Precinct since January 2026
Service
started October 2015,
made $187,000 last year,
Tax #959495
Complaints
6
Complaints
13
Allegations
0
Substantiated
2
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Exonerated
5
SRAD Closure
1
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
3
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202511391,
November 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202412297,
December 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202205049,
May 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #202102987,
April 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Handcuffs too tight |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | American Indian Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | American Indian Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #202101593,
February 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201807495,
August 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 28 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202511391, November 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 25-29 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202412297, December 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 25-29 | SRAD Closure |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 25-29 | SRAD Closure |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | SRAD Closure | |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | SRAD Closure | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202205049, May 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | White Male, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Physical force | White Male, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202102987, April 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Handcuffs too tight | American Indian Female, 35-39 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Discourtesy: Word | American Indian Female, 35-39 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202101593, February 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Action | Black Male, 45-49 | Unsubstantiated |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Black Male, 45-49 | Unsubstantiated |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 45-49 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201807495, August 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Male, 28 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Agenc Demartino, Franco A. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 714976/2025, Supreme Court - Queens, September 9, 2025
Rhodes, Assata vs Willis, Ebony Shawntay, et al.
Case # 25CV01727, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 28, 2025
Complaint