Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $452,000 total settlements.
Huang, Run Ping, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 706912/2014,
Supreme Court - Queens, October 10, 2014
Complaint
Description: On June 11, 2013, a Defendant undercover officer entered Plaintiff's business and requested that she perform a massage. During the massage, the undercover officer attempted to lower his underwear, to which Plaintiff responded 'No Massage, only'. Despite Plaintiff's refusal to perform any sexual act on the officer, the officer signalled other officers to enter the premises to arrest Plaintiff for crimes of Prostitution. The undercover officer than knowingly forwarded fabricated evidence and information which caused Plaintiff to be arrested and prosecuted. Other defendant police officers also contributed to Plaintiff's false arrest and prosecution by destroying exculpatory evidence.
He, Xiaoning vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 700008/2012,
Supreme Court - Queens, March 5, 2012, ended July 6, 2015
$450,000 Settlement
Haynes v. Lt. Raso, Michael, et al.
Case # 17CV03059,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$2,000 Settlement