Richard A. Huaman

Richard A. Huaman

Richard A. Huaman
Badge #12922, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Community Response Team since August 2023
Also served at 77th Precinct
Service started July 2018, made $183,000 last year, Tax #966106

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (2)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Complaints

5 Complaints
13 Allegations
7 Substantiated
5 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202410965, October 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202406265, June 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202406403, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202003127, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201906908, July 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202410965, October 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202406265, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202406403, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202003127, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 47 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201906908, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 41 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Guerrero, Lorandis vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 823973/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 14, 2025

Webster, Joyce vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 525383/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, October 1, 2024
Complaint
Description: In the early afternoon on September 19, 2021, the Plaintiff, a 61-year-old woman who is an active and well-known member of her community, called 311 to request that water services be restored to her building. The water had been turned off as a result of the tenants' long-standing battle with an abusive landlord. At approximately 11:00 a.m., two NYPD members arrived at the plaintiff's residence, placed her in handcuffs and arrested her without explanation. The officers took her to the 77th Precinct where she was told that her landlord told 911 that the plaintiff threatened to have her boyfriend shoot him. The plaintiff didn't have a boyfriend and never made any such comment to the landlord. She explained that he...