Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Kayla A. Jack
Badge #27292,
Black Female
Police Officer at COD Quality Of Life Division since April 2025
Also served at
Sanitation Interagency Liaison,
75th Precinct
Service
started October 2019,
made $97,600 last year,
Tax #968506
Complaints
3
Complaints
10
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
OMB PEG Directive Closure
4
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
Complaint #202400721,
January 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| CCRB Conclusion: | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
Complaint #202304805,
June 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202302075,
March 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Religion) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) |
| Complainant: | Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
| Complainant: | Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons |
| Complainant: | Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Complaint #202400721, January 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | OMB PEG Directive Closure | |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | OMB PEG Directive Closure | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202304805, June 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Hispanic Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Hispanic Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Hispanic Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202302075, March 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Religion) | Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) | Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons | Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.