Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $95,000 total settlements.
Ekeoma, Amarachukwu vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 23CV00946,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 29, 2023
Complaint
Vasquez, Deciana vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 020237/2019E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 9, 2019
Complaint
Description: On January 8, 2018, in the vicinity of 951 Hoe Avenue, NYPD officers, Lilian Almiron, Steven Allen, Doe, Roe (collectively "Defendants") absent an arrest warrant, probable cause, reasonable cause or any legal justification, approached Plaintiff Deciana Vasquez ("Plaintiff") for no reason, and based on fraud, perjury and misrepresentations, and summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered and detained her in an aggressive and excessive manner. While effectuating the seizure of Plaintiff, Defendants did search, seize, assault and commit a battery and grabbed the plaintiff without a court authorized arrest warrant or search warrant and Defendants did physically seize Plaintiff during the arrest proces...
Jones, Shamel vs City of New York
Case # 030145/2017E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 8, 2017, ended June 3, 2025
$75,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 18, 2016, plaintiff was wrongfully and falsely arrested, detained, and imprisoned without any rights or grounds. Plaintiff was wrongfully and falsely accursed of 1st degree crimes among other charges. Lt. Rodriguez, and P.O. Cruz, Santana, Allen, Smith, and Silva, deliberately and maliciously prosecuted plaintiff without any probable cause and without legal process. On November 23, 2016, P.O. Cruz, Santana, Allen, Smith, and Silva, assaulted, battered, and shot plaintiff with negligence, carelessness, and recklessness at an apartment in Bronx. On or about November 23, 2017 at approximately 11:28pm P.O. Cruz, without just cause or provocation willfully and maliciously shot plaintiff causing plaintiff to s...
Grant, Jonathan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV00229,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 20, 2016, ended June 6, 2017
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was in a store when an employee accused him of committing a left the previous month. Officers arrived and watched the surveillance tape, which showed someone different from Plaintiff. Nevertheless, Officers arrested Plaintiff, took him to the 41st precinct, and charged him with Petit Larceny and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the 5th Degree. Officers failed to save the exculpatory surveillance tape and charges were later dismissed.