Matthew D. Davang

Matthew D. Davang

Matthew D. Davang
Badge #268, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at 71st Precinct since October 2025
Also served at 103rd Precinct, 73rd Precinct
Service started July 2018, made $149,000 last year, Tax #966016

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202508026, June 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202300094, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202107724, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202508026, June 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202300094, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202107724, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Female, 30-34 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Diallo, Ibrahima vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 26CV00073, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 9, 2026