Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Force: Physical force
Rulx P. Noel
Badge #27985,
Black Male
Service
started January 2006, ended February 2026,
Tax #940116
Discipline Cases:
Case: 2022-27186
Closed: 12/6/2022
Case: 2019-20143
Closed: 2/13/2019
Case: 2010-1515
Closed: 10/1/2010
View Details
Complaints
4
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Complainant Unavailable
3
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Exonerated
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202501571,
February 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202402060,
February 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
Complaint #201807051,
July 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 55 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 55 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 55 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #201802220,
March 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 13 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Female, 17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Guilty |
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: | Dismissal Probation 25 days |
| APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, July 23, 2021 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202501571, February 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202402060, February 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Offensive Language: Gender | White, 25-29 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201807051, July 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 55 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number | Black Female, 55 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Black Female, 55 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201802220, March 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 13 | Exonerated |
| Force: Physical force | Female, 17 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty | ||
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: Dismissal Probation 25 days | ||
| APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, July 23, 2021 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-27186
Closed: 12/6/2022
Case Details:
- Unauthorized off-duty employment.
Penalty: C - Command Discipline, vacation days (6 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Case: 2019-20143
Closed: 2/13/2019
Case Details:
- Guilty: Wrongful used physical force.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)
Case: 2010-1515
Closed: 10/1/2010
Case Details:
- Guilty: Upon being informed by a person known to the Department that an individual duplicated his restricted parking placard, and that another individual known to the Department was arrested for possessing a duplicate of said restricted parking placard, failed to immediately notify the Department as required.
Penalty: Counseling, pre-trial suspension days (32 days), vacation days (2 days)
Other Documents
NYPD Trial Decision 7/19/2021