Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Cristina J. Andeliz
Badge #18383,
Hispanic Female
Police Officer at Detective Borough Manhattan North since January 2026
Also served at
42nd Precinct
Service
started July 2016,
made $143,000 last year,
Tax #961616
Complaints
4
Complaints
7
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202403704,
April 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| NYPD Conclusion: | Command Discipline - A |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.50 days) |
Complaint #202306943,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202306137,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202104100,
July 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Asian Female, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
| Complaint #202403704, April 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Discourtesy: Word | Female, 35-39 | Unable to Determine |
| NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A | ||
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.50 days) | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202306943, July 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202306137, July 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) | Male, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202104100, July 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Asian Female, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-27314
Closed: 1/9/2023
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules - failed to provide business card
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A