Kathryn Mckenna

Kathryn Mckenna

Kathryn Mckenna
Badge #6768, White Female
Former Police Officer at 52nd Precinct
Service started March 2000, ended August 2020, Tax #925716


Complaints

4 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201012477, September 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201008911, June 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200801187, January 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200707266, April 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201012477, September 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 17 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201008911, June 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200801187, January 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 40 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 40 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200707266, April 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2011-6562
Opened: 12/21/2011
Closed: 1/26/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Having become aware of an allegation of corruption or serious misconduct involving a member of the service, did fail to notify the Internal Affairs Bureau command center
  2. Guilty: Did wrongfully operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
  3. Guilty: Did wrongfully consume an intoxicant to the extent that she was unfit for duty
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year forfeiture of thirty-five (35) vacation days

Case: 2012-8746
Opened: 12/27/2012
Closed: 1/26/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: After receiving a radio transmission to respond to a ì10-56î failed to conduct a proper investigation
Penalty: See case 2011-6562 for penalty


Other Documents