Derek D. Gilson

Derek D. Gilson

Derek D. Gilson
Badge #5409, White Male
Sergeant at 71st Precinct since January 2024, active
Service started July 2006, made $159,000 last year, Tax #941816

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2016-16046
Closed: 6/29/2016

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201409540, September 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201308205, September 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200910329, July 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Black Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201409540, September 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201308205, September 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200910329, July 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 25 Exonerated
Offensive Language: Gender Black Female, 25 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 28 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2016-16046
Closed: 6/29/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
  2. Guilty: While off-duty, wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by the consumption of an intoxicant.
  3. Guilty: While off-duty, wrongfully refused to submit to a chemical breath test to determine blood alcohol concentration.
  4. Guilty: While off-duty, did consume an intoxicant to the extent that he was unfit for duty.
  5. Guilty: While off-duty, operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant and collided with a wooden utility pole.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (35 days), suspended w/o pay (10 days), vacation days (15 days)