Edward Wheeler
Badge #5124,
White Male
Service
started March 1994, ended July 2020,
Tax #907626
Complaints
6
Complaints
10
Allegations
0
Substantiated
4
Complaint Withdrawn
3
Exonerated
1
Unfounded
2
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #201009600,
July 2010
additional details
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Race |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Female |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
Complaint #200804412,
March 2008
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 42 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #200705626,
April 2007
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | White Male, 29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number |
| Complainant: | White Male, 29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | White Male, 29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #200506411,
June 2005
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
Complaint #200411230,
October 2004
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
Complaint #200307268,
September 2003
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 25 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #201009600, July 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Offensive Language: Race | Complaint Withdrawn | |
| Discourtesy: Word | Female | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200804412, March 2008 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | Black Male, 42 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200705626, April 2007 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop | White Male, 29 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | White Male, 29 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number | White Male, 29 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | White Male, 29 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200506411, June 2005 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200411230, October 2004 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Complaint Withdrawn | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200307268, September 2003 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Female, 25 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Reyes, Casimiro vs City of New York, et al.Case # 517144/2016, Supreme Court - Kings, October 3, 2016
Complaint
Description: On or about March 2, 2010, police officers arrested the plaintiff without probable cause or reasonable suspicion to believe that the plaintiff had committed any crime or criminal offense. The following day, on or about March 3, 2010, the police department, fire department, and officers charged the plaintiff and caused him to be prosecuted for various crimes. Before arresting and charging the plaintiff, the defendants improperly coerced false confessions from the plaintiff, fully aware that these confessions were false. Additionally, the defendants knew that the plaintiff was in police custody on unrelated charges at the time of one of the incidents for which he was charged, making it impossible for him to have...