Christopher D. Rickford

Badge #5335, Black Male
Detective Grade 3 at 13th Precinct Detective Squad since April 2014, active
Also served at Transit Bureau District 2
Service started July 2002, made $184,000 last year, Tax #931036

Complaints

2 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complaint Withdrawn
2 Exonerated
2 Unfounded

Complaint #201500391, January 2015
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #200514429, November 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201500391, January 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray Male, 39 Complaint Withdrawn
Force: Physical force Male, 39 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200514429, November 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 32 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 32 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 25 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 32 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Balde, Ibrahima vs Rickford, Christopher, et al.
Case # 17CV01846, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 13, 2017, ended June 12, 2019
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: The plaintiff was on the street when he witnessed an altercation between a drug dealer and two others. The defendant officers approached and one of the other people accused the plaintiff of having taken money from him. The plaintiff explained to the defendant officers that he had run away when he saw the fight occur, but the plaintiff was placed under arrest anyway and charged with grand larceny in the fourth degree and robbery in the second degree. The charges were dismissed and sealed.